Insure-tech reads claim metadata. Legal-tech summarizes records. Neither can answer the clinical question, because the answer is in the chart, not the metadata. We can, and the only credible proof is validation in real medicine.
HIPAA Compliant
SOC 2 Type II CertifiedThree kinds of AI claim this work, and only one actually reads the medicine.
Summarizes records into chronologies, bookmarks, and keyword hits. It organizes the chart instead of reasoning about it.
Reads structured claim data: codes, dates, dollars, and flags. It never opens the clinical question, because the answer isn't in the metadata.
Built by physicians to read the full medical record the way a clinician does, then reason over it: causality, standard of care, comorbidity, and future care. Every conclusion ties to the exact source page and the published literature.
SecondLook was founded by physicians to bring clinical-grade AI to medical record review, reasoning over thousands of pages the way a doctor does, with every conclusion traced to the source and the literature.
Accuracy vs the customer's own physicians, ~400 evaluations
Minutes per case
Operational / total-cost ROI
Academic physicians use SecondLook in their own clinical and defense-consulting work.
An IRB-approved study is underway at UC San Diego to formally evaluate SecondLook's clinical accuracy.

Board member; founder & former CEO, Clarify Health

CEO, Seattle Children's; former CMO/CDO, UC San Diego Health

Former Chief Scientific Officer, Microsoft Health

Insurance analytics leader; former President, ISO Innovative Analytics (Verisk); ex-J.D. Power

Former President & CEO, American Health Holding (Aetna); Guidewire board, Lead Independent Director
SecondLook's report structure is built to ICHCC standards.
See the validation, then see it on your own case.